Combined centre of mass
The total weight can be treated as acting through the weighted-average position of the mass distribution.
Concept module
Shift one support region under one loaded plank and see how centre of mass, support reactions, and torque balance decide whether the object stays stable or tips.
The simulation shows a horizontal plank with its own weight and one movable cargo block. A support region sits under the plank and can move left or right or become narrower or wider. Optional overlays can draw separate weight lines, one combined centre-of-mass line, the support region and stability margin, support reactions, and the torque arm from the support center to the combined centre of mass. Changing cargo mass, cargo position, support center, or support width updates the plank drawing, the reaction readout, the response graphs, the prediction prompts, the worked examples, and the challenge checks from the same static-equilibrium model. A 4 kg plank carries 3 kg of cargo at x = 0.8 m. The total mass is 7 kg and the combined centre of mass is at x_CM = 0.34 m. The support region runs from -0.4 m to 1 m, so the current reactions are R_left = 32.2 N and R_right = 36.4 N. The combined centre of mass stays 0.66 m inside the support region, so both support reactions remain positive.
Interactive lab
Keep the stage, graph, and immediate control feedback in one working view.
Static Equilibrium / Centre of Mass
Drag the cargo block or the support center. The plank mass, combined centre of mass, support region, reaction forces, response graphs, compare mode, and challenge checks all read the same static-balance model.
Graphs
Switch graph views without breaking the live stage and time link.
Torque about the support center
For the current cargo mass, cargo position, and support width, this response curve shows where the support center makes the weight torque vanish.
Controls
Adjust the physical parameters and watch the motion respond.
Changes how strongly the movable block shifts the combined centre of mass and the total supported weight.
Slide the cargo left or right along the plank to shift the combined centre of mass.
Move the support region left or right under the plank without changing the weight distribution.
Narrow or widen the support region to change the stability margin before tipping.
More tools
Secondary controls, alternate presets, and less-used toggles stay nearby without crowding the main bench.
More presets
Presets
Predict -> manipulate -> observe
Keep the active prompt next to the controls so each change has an immediate visible consequence.
Try this
Equation map
Select a symbol to highlight the matching control and the graph or overlay it most directly changes.
Heavier cargo pulls the combined centre of mass more strongly toward its own position and raises the total supported weight.
Equations in play
Choose an equation to sync the active symbol, control highlight, and related graph mapping.
More tools
Detailed noticing prompts, guided overlays, and challenge tasks stay available without taking over the main bench.
What to notice
Use the live prompt to keep the balance story disciplined. Each prompt points at the same static model from a different angle: centre of mass, torque balance, support reactions, or support-region geometry.
Try this
Why it matters
Guided overlays
Focus one overlay at a time to see what it represents and what to notice in the live motion.
Overlay focus
Shows the plank weight and cargo weight separately before combining them into one effective weight line.
What to notice
Why it matters
Static-equilibrium reasoning is cleaner when you can see where the total weight came from instead of treating the centre of mass like magic.
Challenge mode
Use the same static bench to prove that you can read centre of mass, torque balance, and support reactions together instead of as separate rules.
3 of 6 checks
Suggested start
The checklist updates from the live simulation state, active graph, overlays, inspect time, and compare setup.
Combined centre of mass
The total weight can be treated as acting through the weighted-average position of the mass distribution.
Vertical force balance
The support reactions together must hold up the total weight.
Torque balance for static equilibrium
Even if the forces add to zero, the supported object is not in static equilibrium unless the torques also cancel.
Support-region stability rule
The combined centre-of-mass line must fall inside the support region if both reactions are going to stay upward and physically possible.
Progress
Not startedMastery: NewLocal-firstStart exploring and Open Model Lab will keep this concept's progress on this browser first. Challenge mode has 3 compact tasks ready. No finished quick test, solved challenge, or completion mark is saved yet.
Try this setup
Copy the live bench state and reopen this concept with the same controls, graph, overlays, and compare context.
Stable links
Starter track
Step 2 of 50 / 5 completeEarlier steps still set up Static Equilibrium / Centre of Mass.
Previous step: Torque.
Short explanation
Static equilibrium means two things are true at once: the upward and downward forces balance, and the torques about any point balance as well. For supported objects, those two conditions are easiest to read by tracking where the combined weight acts.
This bench stays bounded on purpose. One plank has its own weight, one movable cargo block shifts the mass distribution, and one adjustable support region can move or narrow. The same live state drives the stage, support reactions, response graphs, worked examples, challenge checks, and quick test, so centre-of-mass reasoning never drifts away from the torque language introduced in Torque.
Key ideas
Live balance checks
3 kg
0.8 m
4 kg
1. Start from the weighted-average centre-of-mass rule
2. Substitute the live masses and cargo position
3. Read the combined weight location
Combined centre of mass and total weight
Support-region checkpoint
Prediction prompt
Check your reasoning
Common misconception
If the total upward force equals the total downward force, the object must be stable.
Force balance alone is not enough. Equal and opposite forces can still leave a net torque that makes the object start rotating.
For a supported object, the combined centre of mass must also project inside the support region. Otherwise the reactions needed to keep the plank flat are not physically possible.
Quick test
Reasoning
Question 1 of 3
Choose one answer to reveal feedback, then test the idea in the live system if a guided example is available.
Accessible description
The simulation shows a horizontal plank with its own weight and one movable cargo block. A support region sits under the plank and can move left or right or become narrower or wider. Optional overlays can draw separate weight lines, one combined centre-of-mass line, the support region and stability margin, support reactions, and the torque arm from the support center to the combined centre of mass.
Changing cargo mass, cargo position, support center, or support width updates the plank drawing, the reaction readout, the response graphs, the prediction prompts, the worked examples, and the challenge checks from the same static-equilibrium model.
Graph summary
The support-torque graph is a response sweep against support center and shows where the torque about the support center crosses zero for the current cargo state. The support-reactions graph sweeps support center again and plots the left and right reactions required for static equilibrium, including when one would need to go negative.
The cargo-stability graph sweeps cargo position for the current support geometry and reports the margin to the nearest support edge. Positive margin means the combined centre-of-mass line is inside the support region, and negative margin means tipping.
Carry balance ideas forward
These suggestions come from the concept registry, so the reason label reflects either curated guidance or the fallback progression logic.
Keep the same total mass and torque, then slide equal masses inward or outward to see why moment of inertia makes some rotors much harder to spin up than others.
Roll a sphere, cylinder, hoop, or custom mass distribution down one incline and see how rolling without slipping ties translation, rotation, and rotational inertia to the same honest run.
Treat angular momentum as rotational momentum on one compact rotor where mass radius and spin rate stay tied to the same readouts, response maps, and same-L conservation story.